No-Match Letters are Back!
Everything Old is New Again
The Social Security Administration (SSA) has resumed the sending of Social Security No-Match letters to employers. These “No-Match letters”, also known as Decentralized Correspondence (DECOR) letters have been around since 1979 but were suspended in 2009 after the controversial DHS “No Match Rule” was rescinded.
The SSA had been sending these letters to employers when information provided by the employer did not match SSA records. Though the letter may be daunting, it is possible the name and SSN combination cannot be matched for a variety of reasons including misspellings, transposed numbers, name changes or incomplete information provided by the employer. Unfortunately, mismatches may also be due to the use of false SSNs or identity theft.
On April 6, 2011, SSA resumed sending no-match letters to employers when the names or social security numbers listed on a W-2 form do not match SSA records. The purpose in sending these letters is to inform the employer and employee there is a database discrepancy which may affect future Social Security benefits.
The DECOR letter makes no statement about an employee’s immigration status and cautions employers that the letter is not a basis in itself to take any adverse action such as suspending or firing the employee. A FAQ on the SSA website provides advice for employers in dealing with the no-match letter.
The letter also includes a “Privacy Act” notice which informs the employer the SSA may share the information with the IRS for tax purposes or with the Department of Justice. In addition, the Office of Special Counsel for Immigration-related Unfair Employment Practices (OSC) published revised guidance regarding how employers can respond to no-match letters in November 2010.
Upon receipt of a No-Match letter, an employer should proceed cautiously with the assistance of qualified counsel.
Final Rule –- Finally Final!
On April 14, 2011, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced a final rule that adopts the changes made to the Form I-9 process by the Department of Homeland Security in April 2009. These changes to the Form I-9 went into effect in April 2009, including the rule that employers can no longer accept expired documents as proof of identity or work authorization when completing the form.
On December 17, 2008, DHS published an interim rule which included the following changes:
- Prohibits employers from accepting expired documents in Section 2;
- Removed Form I-688, “Temporary Resident Card,” and Forms I-688A and I-688B, “Employment Authorization Cards,” from the Lists of Acceptable Documents ;
- Added to List A the new U.S. passport card and the temporary Form I-551, “Permanent Resident Card,” with a machine-readable immigrant visa;
- Added documentation for certain citizens of the Federated States of Micronesia (FSM) and the Republic of the Marshall Islands (RMI) to List A to more accurately reflect their status under the Compacts of Free Association;
- Amended the Form I-9 (Rev. 02/02/2009) to provide in Section 1 a separate box for noncitizen nationals.
The current version of the Form I-9 bears the expiration date of 8/31/12.
As is apparent with the new “old” rules and procedures, employers must stay vigilant to remain compliant with Form I-9 processes. Implementing a comprehensive approach to I-9 compliance which includes formal training, written compliance policies, regular assessment audits, and the assistance of qualified specialists can help an employer navigate the complex process which is I-9 compliance.
Many people know the definition of insanity as doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. Unfortunately, many employers are taking an “insane approach” to I-9 training by utilizing in-house trainers who are not qualified to teach Form I-9 compliance.
Have you heard about the “new” E-Verify Self Check? E-Verify Self-Check will allow individuals to check their own work authorization status prior to being hired by an employer. The purpose of allowing self-check is to facilitate the correction of errors which might lead to an employer receiving a tentative non-confirmation (TNC) at the time they process a new hire through E-Verify.
If you are like Howard Industries, a manufacturing company in Mississippi, you find out when Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) investigates your business and you ultimately pay $2.5 million dollars in fines as a result of the actions of one human resources manager.
To protect your business I urge you to order a full 